The most recent issue, Volume 7, Number 2, of The International Journal of the Book includes:

• Is Bibliography Reactionary? by Vincent Giroud.
• If u txt 2 much, duz it mean u cant spell: Exploring the Connection between SMS Use and Lowered Performance in Spelling by Rosalind Raymond Gann, Karin Bartoszuk and Jillian H. Anderson.
• The Conditions Required to Enable the Reader to Approach a Text by Gilly Perel-Dayan.
• Brand Concepts in Publishing by Irini Pitsaki.
• Finding American Ideals in Early Primers by Laurie Andes.

Steve Jobs discussing the iBooks application for the Apple iPad at its debut in San Francisco, January 27, 2010 (Tom Avelar/Bloomberg/Getty Images)

From Jason Epstein in the New York Review of Books:

The transition within the book publishing industry from physical inventory stored in a warehouse and trucked to retailers to digital files stored in cyberspace and delivered almost anywhere on earth as quickly and cheaply as e-mail is now underway and irreversible. This historic shift will radically transform worldwide book publishing, the cultures it affects and on which it depends. Meanwhile, for quite different reasons, the genteel book business that I joined more than a half-century ago is already on edge, suffering from a gambler’s unbreakable addiction to risky, seasonal best sellers, many of which don’t recoup their costs, and the simultaneous deterioration of backlist, the vital annuity on which book publishers had in better days relied for year-to-year stability through bad times and good. The crisis of confidence reflects these intersecting shocks, an overspecialized marketplace dominated by high-risk ephemera and a technological shift orders of magnitude greater than the momentous evolution from monkish scriptoria to movable type launched in Gutenberg’s German city of Mainz six centuries ago.

Though Gutenberg’s invention made possible our modern world with all its wonders and woes, no one, much less Gutenberg himself, could have foreseen that his press would have this effect. And no one today can foresee except in broad and sketchy outline the far greater impact that digitization will have on our own future. With the earth trembling beneath them, it is no wonder that publishers with one foot in the crumbling past and the other seeking solid ground in an uncertain future hesitate to seize the opportunity that digitization offers them to restore, expand, and promote their backlists to a decentralized, worldwide marketplace. New technologies, however, do not await permission. They are, to use Schumpeter’s overused term, disruptive, as nonnegotiable as earthquakes.

For the full article…

The second issue of Volume 7 of The International Journal of the Book is now available.

Volume 7, Number 2 includes:

• Travels with More’s Utopia: Provenance Discovery through Marginalia and Annotations by Robin Smith.
• Young Adult Fiction in 1980s (West) Germany The Paperback Series “Rororo Panther” (Rowohlt) “Problem-oriented Novels” for Young Adult Readers by Corinna Norrick.
• Ghosts between the Pages: The Devolution of Medb from Sovereignty Goddess to Comic Book Villainess and the Potential Dangers of the Transcription of Oral Tales by Megan Amber Condis.
• Media Rich PDF Publishing: Bridging the Gap Between Traditional Print and Multimedia Publishing by Jason Lisi.
• Disruptive Innovations in Book Publishing - Threat or Opportunity? by Bozena Izabela Mierzejewska.

In another blow to Google’s plan to create a giant digital library and bookstore, the Justice Department on Thursday said that a class-action settlement between the company and groups representing authors and publishers had significant legal problems, even after recent revisions.

In a 31-page filing that could influence a federal judge’s ruling on the settlement, the department said the new agreement was much improved from an earlier version. But it said the changes were not enough to placate concerns that the deal would grant Google a monopoly over millions of orphan works, meaning books whose right holders are unknown or cannot be found.

The department also indicated that the revised agreement, like its predecessor, appeared to run afoul of authors’ copyrights and was too broad in scope.

The revised agreement “suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class-action mechanism to implement forward-looking business arrangements that go far beyond the dispute before the court in this litigation,” the department wrote.

The department asked the court to encourage the parties to continue discussions on further changes to the settlement, which it said had many public benefits.

For the full article…